We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
109028, Moscow,
11 Pokrovsky Boulevard,
Room Т-614
Phone: (495) 628-83-68
email: fes@hse.ru
Founded in 1992, the HSE Faculty of Economics is the university’s oldest faculty. In the years since it was founded, it has gained a reputation as Russia’s leader in terms of higher economic education.
A fundamental education in modern economic theory and mathematics is combined with the study of applied disciplines, such as taxation, budget policies and processes, financial management and other related fields.
Applied Econometrics. 2024.
In bk.: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. Oxford University Press, 2024.
Dagaev D., Paklina S., Parshakov P.
Social Science Research Network. Social Science Research Network. SSRN, 2024
Our first speaker in the FES International Seminar Series this academic year is Kemal Yıldız, who is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Bilkent University in Ankara. His research interests span over several theory fields such as game theory, choice theory, mechanism design, matching theory and bounded rationality. His publications appeared in Journal of Economic Theory, Games and Economic Behavior, Theoretical Economics.
Speaker: Kemal Yıldız, Bilkent University
Title: Choice through a unified lens: The prudential model (with Serhat Dogan)
Abstract: We present a new choice model. An agent is endowed with two sets of preferences: pro-preferences and con-preferences. For each choice set, if an alternative is the top-ranked for a pro-preference (con-preference), then this is a pro (con) for choosing that alternative. The alternative with more pros than cons is chosen from each choice set. Each preference may have a weight reflecting its salience. In this case, the probability that an alternative is chosen equals the difference between the weights of its pros and cons. We show that this model provides a unified lens through which every nuance of the rich human choice behavior can be structurally explained.
Date: September 16, 2019 (Monday)
Time: 13:40-15:00
Venue: Pokrovka campus, room T510 (109028, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard 11)
For external participants: to order the pass, please contact Disa Malbakhova dmalbakhova@hse.ru