We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
109028, Moscow,
Pokrovsky Boulevard 11, Rooms: S1029, S1030
Phone: +7 (495) 772-95-90*27172, 27173, 27174
The Department of Theoretical Economics brings together highly qualified specialists in various fields of economics, including micro and macroeconomics, monetary and financial theory, economic history and the history of economic thought. Our mission is to teach economic disciplines at HSE on the level of leading Western universities.
Dranev Y., Miriakov M., Ochirova E. et al.
Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2024. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 5-19.
Olga Demidova, Elena Kayasheva, Artem Demyanenko.
In bk.: Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives: Proceedings of the 38th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference. Vol. 25. Springer Publishing Company, 2023. Ch. 13. P. 209-232.
Tabashnikova D., Sandomirskaia M.
Economics. EC. Высшая школа экономики, 2023. No. 263.
Department of Theoretical Economics invites you to attend the research seminar with Postgraduate Student Vladimir Schukin, HSE
Date: May 26, 2020
Time: 1:40 p.m.
Working language: English
Speaker: Vladimir Schukin, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Theoretical Economics
The link to Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/96772969416
Title: "Clientelism and development: Vote-buying meets patronage"
Abstract: Offering employment in the public sector in exchange for electoral support (patronage politics) and vote buying are clientelist practices frequently used by political machines. In the literature, these practices are typically studied in isolation. In this paper, we study how the interaction between these two practices (as opposed to having just one tool) affects economic development. We present a theoretical model of political competition, where, prior to election, the incumbent chooses the level of state investment which can improve productivity in the private sector. This decision affects income levels of employees in the private sector, and, thereby, the costs and effectiveness of vote-buying and patronage. We show, that when the politician can use both clientelist instruments simultaneously, his opportunity cost per vote secured declines because these tools can complement more than substitute each other. Furthermore, if rents to office is sufficiently high, the equilibrium level of state investment also declines.