• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Глава в книге
Conflict Measure of Belief Functions with Blurred Focal Elements on the Real Line

Lepskiy A.

In bk.: Belief Functions: Theory and Applications: 6th International Conference, BELIEF 2021, Shanghai, China, October 15–19, 2021, Proceedings. Vol. 12915. Springer, 2021. P. 197-206.

Препринт
Свойства агрегированной квазигидродинамической системы уравнений гомогенной газовой смеси с общей регуляризующей скоростью

Злотник А. А., Федченко А. С.

Препринты ИПМ им. М.В. Келдыша. Институт прикладной математики им. М.В. Келдыша Российской академии наук, 2021. № 77.

Семинар "Политическая экономика": Xu Xu (Princeton University) о социальных издержках цифрового наблюдения.

На семинаре "Политическая экономика" Xu Xu (Princeton University) рассказал о том, что цифровая слежка сдерживает политическое участие без некоторых дорогостоящих побочных продуктов личной слежки.

Тема: The Social Costs of Digital vs. In-Person Surveillance

Аннотация:

The world is witnessing an explosion of digital surveillance in recent years. This paper examines the social costs of digital surveillance versus in-person surveillance in dictatorships. I argue that both types of surveillance deter political participation because citizens fear targeted repression. However, digital surveillance does not entail human-agent intrusion into private lives and therefore is less likely to undermine interpersonal trust and regime legitimacy than in-person surveillance. I manipulate information about surveillance operations in an in-the-field survey experiment on college students in two regions of China and find supportive evidence. I further establish the external validity of the experimental findings on digital surveillance using a nationally representative survey and a natural experiment caused by the 2015 Tianjin explosion. Overall, the findings that digital surveillance deters political participation without some of the costly byproducts of in-person surveillance have board implications for surveillance in dictatorships and even in democracies.