We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
109028, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard 11, T423
Phone: +7 (495) 621 13 42,
+ 7(495) 772 95 90 *27200; *27212.
Email: dhm-econ@hse.ru; shatskaya@hse.ru
Aleskerov F. T., Shvydun S., Meshcheryakova N.
CRC Press, 2022.
Belenky A., Fedin G., Kornhauser A.
International Journal of Public Administration. 2021. Vol. 44. No. 13. P. 1076-1089.
In bk.: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2328: ICMM-2020. AIP Publishing LLC, 2021. Ch. 060001. P. 060001-1-060001-4.
Zlotnik A., Kireeva O.
math. arXiv. Cornell University, 2020. No. arXiv:2011.14104v2[math.NA].
Abstract:
We explore electoral accountability in a two-period model in which an incumbent government chooses whether to implement a policy with a known payoff or a "reform" policy that yields higher or lower payoffs (to voters and ministers) depending on whether the minister implementing it is competent or not. An opposition can also reveal information about its average competence via its choice of campaign. Voters cast their votes based on what they learn about the rival teams' relative competence and anticipate collective decisions made by an incoming cabinet. Although collective decision-making in the team induces a hold-up problem --ministers revealed as incompetent will veto the implementation of reform we show that electoral competition between rival teams, as in that between a cabinet and its shadow, provides levels of reform that are always too high from the voters perspective. This can provide perverse incentives for voters to select teams that are on average of lower competence than their opponents. An increase in the qualified majority rule threshold can, surprisingly, increase levels of reform.