We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
ФКН
Article
An Approach to Estimating the Economic Expediency of Developing a New Cargo Transport Hub by a Regional Public Administration

Belenky A., Fedin G., Kornhauser A.

International Journal of Public Administration. 2021. Vol. 44. No. 13. P. 1076-1089.

Book chapter
A note on subspaces of fixed grades in Clifford algebras

Shirokov D.

In bk.: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2328: ICMM-2020. AIP Publishing LLC, 2021. Ch. 060001. P. 060001-1-060001-4.

Working paper
On compact 4th order finite-difference schemes for the wave equation

Zlotnik A., Kireeva O.

math. arXiv. Cornell University, 2020. No. arXiv:2011.14104v2[math.NA].

Contacts

109028, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard 11, T423
Phone: +7 (495) 621 13 42,
+ 7(495) 772 95 90 *27200; *27212.
Email: dhm-econ@hse.ru; shatskaya@hse.ru

Administration
School Head Fuad T. Aleskerov
Manager Oksana Kolotvina
Svetlana Shatskaya
Senior Administrator Svetlana Shatskaya

Anja Neundorf Spoke on 'Contextual and Individual Determinants of Economic Preferences: Evidence from Panel Data'

On October 13 a research seminar on political economy took place at HSE. Anja Neundorf (University of Nottingham) presented the report on 'Contextual and Individual Determinants of Economic Preferences: Evidence from Panel Data'.

Abstract:

To what extent does economic self-interest shape policy preferences? This paper argues that individuals are more likely to translate personal hardship into higher support for redistributive social policies when political elites actively compete over redistributive issues. We first test this argument using individual panel data from Great Britain. We find evidence that the discursive context mediates the relationship between economic hardship and preferences. Using data from 24 European countries we then show that, where elites polarize over redistributive issues, low-income respondents are more likely – relative to high-income individuals – to support redistribution.