We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
109028, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard 11, T423
Phone: +7 (495) 621 13 42,
+ 7(495) 772 95 90 *27200; *27212.
Email: dhm-econ@hse.ru; shatskaya@hse.ru
Aleskerov F. T., Shvydun S., Meshcheryakova N.
CRC Press, 2022.
Belenky A., Fedin G., Kornhauser A.
International Journal of Public Administration. 2021. Vol. 44. No. 13. P. 1076-1089.
In bk.: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2328: ICMM-2020. AIP Publishing LLC, 2021. Ch. 060001. P. 060001-1-060001-4.
Zlotnik A., Kireeva O.
math. arXiv. Cornell University, 2020. No. arXiv:2011.14104v2[math.NA].
Abstract:
This study seeks an answer as to how emotions motivate citizens to become politically more involved. Current literature on this topic has distinguished between participation to politics in general and participation to social movements. Following the same approach, this project experimentally tests the effects of anxiety, anger, and enthusiasm on the two domains of political participation. By manipulating these emotions in two experimental studies I examine whether emotions are integral in generating the action tendencies that lead to political participation, especially in times of polarization and electoral decisions. Findings show that whilst anxiety motivates greater interest in politics, anger decreases the same likelihood. As opposed to these results, anger and enthusiasm fuel participation to social movements whilst anxiety reduces the same propensity. These results are further discussed within the context of Turkey and the broader scholarly literature.